Compatibility Commitment
Murex is committed to backwards compatibility. While we do want to continue to grow and improve the shell, this will not come at the expense of long term usability.
Our compatibility commitment
You can consider Murex as stable. Many of us are using Murex as our primary shell, some for years. There is already a non-trivial amount of code written for Murex and that code will remain compatible for many years to come.
The following is a breakdown of Murex's development and backwards compatibility commitment, in the hope it brings confidence to new users.
Features
Any feature in the master branch (ie in a stable build) and thus published on https://murex.rocks is considered stable.
Stable features are seldom removed (seriously, there are still parser rules for undocumented but deprecated features from five years ago!).
If a feature is to be deprecated, the following steps are followed:
- first a deprecation notice is served in these docs
- after the next new major update, a warning will then be issued with the feature itself. When that feature is invoked, the warning will give notice of the deprecation
- after the following new major update, that feature will then be removed
This process is expected to take around two years. You do not need to regularly follow the Github discussions to keep track of changes to the shell.
Features are only likely to be deprecated if they are unpopular.
Breaking changes
A breaking change is considered to be any change that could affect any Murex shell script already written.
Breaking changes might happen outside of the feature deprecation life cycle (described above) if:
- it is adding a new syntax rather than deprecating something (such as a new operator)
- and the breakages are edge cases as opposed to common (eg a bareword string that solely consists of the new operator is now parsed as an operator rather than a string)
Breaking changes will be published in the changelog.
Experimental features
Any feature marked as EXPERIMENTAL is subject to change at short notice. Very few features end up as experimental and those that do might be because they either introduce weird syntax that needs using in real situations to determine their value, or might have some unresolved bugs and/or edge cases that harm the overall UX. Generally features do not remain experimental for long.
Development releases
The develop branch is considered unstable. It is a place for contributors to write and test code. This means all new features added to develop that hasn't yet been released to master is considered experimental.
Versioning
Murex releases roughly follows semantic versioning.
See Also
- How To Contribute: Murex is community project. We gratefully accept contributions
- Install: Installation Instructions
This document was generated from gen/root/compatibility_doc.yaml.